Student Team: NO
Approximately how many
hours were spent working on this submission in total?
50h
May we post your
submission in the Visual Analytics Benchmark Repository after VAST Challenge
2017 is complete? YES
Video
N/A
Questions
GC.1 – Provide your
best hypothesis with supporting evidence of what is happening in the Lekagul Preserve that is affecting the Rose-crested Blue
Pipit. Your answer should include identification of who is responsible for the
impactful activities, what they are doing, where impactful events are
occurring, when and how often these occur, how these events are taking place,
and why they are happening. Please limit
your response to 1000 words and 6 images.
Our
hypothesis is that Kasios is affecting the
Rose-crested Blue Pipit with various actions.
Contrary to
their promise, they continue to emit Methylosmolene,
which was discovered in MC2. The emission happens regularly only at night, so
we suspect that they are aware that this is an illegal activity and try to hide
it.
In the
bi-annual newsletter from December 2015, an employee stated he has “odd working
hours” at Kasios. In June 2013, they were looking for
new employees which think “out of the box” and “have broken the rules”.
Eventually, this pun should be taken literally: In MC1, we discovered that
trucks tend to leave the MIP from entrance3 on a regular basis in the early
morning hours. Maybe those trucks drive away illegal waste resulting from the
use of the VOC.
We also
spotted a suspicious truck of type 4 which always operates at late night hours
between 2:00 am and 5:00 am. It leaves the MIP from entrance3, illegally passes
gate6, gate5 and gate3 and ends up at ranger-stop3 where it spends around 45 to
90 minutes before driving back the same way. It is possible that there is some
illegal activity, like waste disposal, taking place.
Furthermore,
out of all companies, Kasios is the one with the
biggest growth rate. It is expanding the number of employees (30 people were
hired in December 2014, including “transportation experts”), and also its
facilities (in a three-year plan started in 2014, see newsletter from June
2013).
This
expansion diminishes the habitat of the birds and causes more traffic through
the park, which also affects wild life. This goes hand in hand with the reports
of the bi-annual newsletter from June 2016, which indicates that traffic is
increasing through the preserve.
The
expansion of the preserve was observed and documented in the images of MC3.
GC.2 – Provide a timeline
that comprehensively describes the relevant activities in Mistford,
the Industrial Park, and the Preserve that helps concisely describe the events
identified in Question 1. Please limit
your response to 1000 words and 6 images.
The timeline
(Figure 1) depicts events found in the
Semi-Annual newsletters (upper half) and data from the Mini-Challenges (lower
half). One can see that Kasios is consistently growing,
hiring more employees and extending their facilities according to their
expansion-announcement in June. At the end of 2016, traffic increased in the
preserve not only due to seasonal reasons, but also due to “improvements that
encourage traffic”. This correlates to the finding of new buildings and streets
in MC3.
Additionally,
there is the quote of an employee trucker at Kasios
which states odd working hours. This
statement falls into the period where the suspicious truck was found in the
data of MC1. Furthermore, the sensor data from MC2 proves that Kasios continues emitting Methylosmolene,
contradicting their statement from June 2013.
Figure
1: Timeline.
GC.3 – How confident are
you in your hypothesis? What factors impact your confidence in your hypothesis?
What additional information would help strengthen your hypothesis? Please limit
your response to 500 words and 3 images.
The
fact that Kasios continues to emit Methylosmolene years after they announced an early stop of
using this chemical makes the company highly suspicious. This, in combination
with the constant driving behavior of the suspicious truck and the statement
from the employee strengthen the hypothesis. But even if Kasios
does not get rid of their trash illegally inside the preserve, the radical
expansion and growth of the company is another indicator that Kasios affects the birds in the preserve.
Useful
additional information to strengthen the hypothesis would be traffic data from
a longer period of time, so we could check if an overall increase of trucks
over the years caused by the growth of the company might cause the birds to
diminish.
Furthermore,
information to which company the trucks coming from entrance3 belong to would
help to see if it is really a Kasios truck which is
involved in strange late-night driving activity.
GC.4 – What are your
proposed next steps? Do you have a course of action to correct the problems in
the Lekagul Preserve and help the Rose-crested Blue
Pipit? Please limit your response to 500
words and 3 images.
There should be a thorough inspection of Kasios activities regarding the emission of Methylosmolene. An inspection of late-night activities of
the trucks (e.g., if they try to get rid of illegal waste in the preserve)
should also be conducted.
The company finally has to stop using the VOC and should
pay a high fine which is invested into a program to help the birds.
Additionally, there should be a study of the development of traffic.
Drive-through traffic, especially trucks from Companies, should be minimized
(eventually by building a bypass rout, so trucks and employees can reach the
MIP without driving through the preserve).